Mr Chidi Odinkalu, Chairman NHRC
Dear Mr Chidi Odinkalu,
As the Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), I feel more comfortable addressing this
correspondence to you than, say, writing to President Goodluck Jonathan for
example, who, to mind, is overwhelmed by the enormity of the challenges facing
this country to the extent that he needs our prayers for God’s guidance on what
to do. I have a lot of respect for NHRC and what you are doing in partnership
with other civil society organisations for the protection and advancement of
human rights in Nigeria. Though the word ‘independent’ is not part of its name,
I assume that, under your leadership, the NHRC, in exercising its mandate, is
more independent than Jega’s INEC which oftentimes gives the impression
of acting at the behest of the ruling party. Doubtless, NHRC and the honourable
members of its Board will not betray the confidence reposed in them by assenting
to the dictates of anybody in discharging their responsibilities.
You were quoted in the media recently expressing your concern
‘over the killing of over 200 civilians including women and children in Baga,
Borno State,’ and also calling ‘for a quick and diligent investigation that
will lead to an open and transparent trial of persons behind this avoidable
loss of lives and property’. You said, ‘In order to understand what happened,
it is necessary to undertake an independent and credible assessment of the
situation in the affected locations.’ (LEADERSHIP of Wednesday, May 1, 2013)
This is commendable given the fact that NHRC is a government establishment
and the Executive arm of that government is playing ostrich with the actual
number of fatalities in the Baga massacre. A motion was raised in the upper
legislative chambers of the National Assembly by Senator Maina Ma’aji Lawal in
which he averred that ‘between one hundred and eighty and two hundred human
lives were lost and numerous others unaccounted for…’ This Distinguished Senator who is from the
area also said that he personally counted 220 graves apart from eight other
graves he was told were not in the two cemeteries he visited. A local government official who witnessed burial
of bodies said, ‘anybody who says the number of the dead is not up to 300 is
not a resident of Baga’.
The Presidential Spokesman Reuben Abati relying on a
purported report by NEMA said that ‘they found only 32 fresh graves in Baga
while the Defence HQ team said 30 insurgents were killed in action while six
more bodies were later found 3 kilometres from the scene of the violence’. But NEMA
officials were denied access into Baga until 8 days after the MNJTF ‘fired
indiscriminately at civilians, killing hundreds and’ setting thousands of home
ablaze.
According to Abati, the Defence Headquarters, in a submission
to President Jonathan, stated that the Multinational Joint Task Force’s
activities are legal and need to be sustained. There was this mention of mass
graves by the Defence Headquarters that ‘some locals were asked if they could
take the assessment team to the mass graves where 185 people were allegedly
buried, but the people denied knowledge of such graves. The Chairman of Kukawa
LGA was approached on the same issue, he also did not know of such graves.’ On item
(f) of the report, the Defence Headquarters continued, that ‘The chairman had
earlier informed the team that Muslims do not bury more than one body in a
grave.’ This is their own manufacture in order to muddle the waters. No body
mentioned any case of mass graves in Baga. And this Kukawa LGA chairman was
either not contacted at all on this issue or he does not know that Islaam has
provision for mass graves if need be. Islaam has stipulated conditions, dos and
don’ts during mass grave burials. But in this Baga case there was no such
thing. All bodies were buried individually and the Senator said he personally
counted them one by one until he recorded 220. There were no mass graves, and
nobody mentioned that but this contrived report by the Defence Headquarters!
By the way, if President Jonathan has ordered a probe of the
incident and the report of that probe is not yet out, is it not crass prejudice
for Abati to predetermine the results by announcing that the number of civilian
lives lost was grossly inflated? What explains why the press is not allowed from
access to the ‘scene of the crime’?
The Human Rights Watch (HRW), as reported by LEADERSHIP Thursday,
02 May 2013, in its report on Wednesday, 01 May, 2013, has argued that
satellite images and witness accounts on the Baga incident ‘raised concerns of
cover-up, as images reveal massive destruction of civilian property from a
military raid on April 16 and 17, 2013, in the northern Nigerian town of Baga,
undermining the military’s claim that only 30 houses were destroyed’. In the
said report, HRW further stated that ‘During security raids in communities
where attacks have occurred, the military has burned homes and summarily executed
men in front of their families. The Nigerian authorities have also arrested
thousands of people in raids across the north. Many of these people have been
held incommunicado without charge or trial for months or even years. In some
cases they have been detained in inhuman conditions, torture, or killed.
‘The Nigerian authorities have repeatedly denied allegations
of security force abuses, labelling those who report such abuses as ‘Boko Haram
sympathisers’.
Mr Chairman, residents in almost all the places that the JTF
has operated have said that the troops invade civilian homes around 12
mid-night, ask for the whereabouts of the menfolk, and summarily kill any male
from the age of 15 upwards. If a single empty can of any brand of soft drink
like Coke or Maltina was found in such a raid, nobody will be spared in the household – they will all be
mown down and the house set ablaze.
In some cases the entire male teenagers of a town were
arrested and taken to the JTF camp in either Maiduguri or Damaturu. They are
tortured and even killed; their parents would be coerced to sign an undertaking
affirming that their wards were members Boko Haram, and pay N20, 000 to claim
their bodies.
Many will remember how it took the efforts of Al- Jazeera
television to show that the police killed the leader of the misguided sect,
Mohammad Yusuf; and that they killed innocent people including the crippled in
cold blood as part of the ‘fight against terror’ in Northern Nigeria. Are we
having a repeat albeit more sinister and better executed version of that
gruesome event?
I know that the unenlightened, the bigots (tribal and
religious), the Islamophobes and hate mongers in our midst will immediately
accuse yours truly of either being a sympathiser, sponsor or member of the
deluded group called Boko Haram; that is to be expected. Afterall, why did I qualify
them in such unendearing terms to begin with? What I do not expect is
that those who know better should either be quiet because it is not their part
of the country or covertly support the JTF for “giving it to those scoundrels”.
The actions of Boko Haram are haraam for any sane Muslim; and
the leaders of Boko Haram do not appear or act sane. Their actions are evidence
of their lack of understanding of Islam. Killing any innocent person is a most grievous
crime in Islam; even in error. How can anyone then justify killing hundreds,
nay, thousands of both Muslims and Christians who have done nothing but being
in the neighbourhood of the roving madmen? Every time Boko Haram strikes, Islam
is placed on trial and Muslims are seen as guilty until they can prove
themselves to be innocent. In an age where truth is the first casualty at the
outbreak of any conflict, it is an impossible task. More often than not, Muslims
have to rely on right thinking, unbiased non-Muslims to defend them. Some
people are not so intelligent as to isolate a crime from a religion.
The most amusing and saddest argument in support of the Baga
massacre is that the people of Baga harboured the insurgents and so it was OK
to kill them. The military also said Boko Haram men used civilians as human
shields. If this is the case, movie lovers and those who know little about
military laws would assume that the rule of engagement is to fire at the insurgents
even in a dense civilian population. Two American movies; Collateral Damage and
Rules of Engagement were used as propaganda tools to explain away high civilian
casualty figures in Afghanistan and Iraq. It took Wikileaks to show the world
the truth.
The reality is different; people were systematically dragged
out of their homes and shot in cold blood. Witnesses recounted how the soldiers
were saying aloud on the streets that they would treat the villagers like the
insurgents since they could not bring them out. Yet the truth is that if the
villagers dared to expose the criminals, they met their end at the hands of the
terrorists. If they failed to mention where they hide, they were still executed
by the MNJTF! This has been the dilemma of those living in these troubled spots
and who have nowhere else to call home. In other parts of the sane world,
witnesses are protected from harm but in Nigeria, you are on your own!
All this is apart from the fact that the frequent murder of
innocent lives by the security forces has eroded any thoughts of cooperation
from the minds of many of the inhabitants of the troubled spots. The world condemned
the massacres at Odi and Zaki Biam during the Obasanjo years for the same
reasons that some people are now applauding the MNJTF! What has changed is the
tribe and religion of those at the receiving end. Imagine for once that Baga is
your village and picture uncles and cousins and aunts and grandfathers wiped
out because the military found insurgents in the area. You will not fail to see
how terrible the crime is.
Mr Chairman, NHRC has autonomy to bring about an independent
investigation into what actually happened in Baga. You have vowed to do just
that, and Nigerians do not expect anything less from you.
may Allah saves us in the hands of enemies of islam
ReplyDelete